Begin With a Document Test
The first filter is not a star rating; it is a document test. A claim either produces something you can hold before committing, or it cannot be falsified from outside the clinic. Bucket A includes an itemized treatment plan, a named treating clinician, a fee schedule, and financing terms. Bucket B includes “free,” “guaranteed,” “painless,” “permanent,” and “best in the city.” It is structurally unfalsifiable: you cannot check it without booking, and the clinic controls the terms. Google’s publisher policies name misleading representation and deceptive practices as prohibited categories, but those standards govern advertising and publisher content, not dental practice.
Put Phrases Against Checkable Requests
The table maps phrases from Google’s publisher policies and AFS compliance guidance to a request you can make now. No cell asserts clinical quality or price.
| Claim | Documented category | Request instead |
|---|
| “Free implant” or “$199 implant,” conditions unstated | Free or cash offer; unreasonably cheap offer examples | Written fee schedule with exclusions and extras |
| “Guaranteed for life” or “permanent, never fails” | Outcome guarantee with unstated terms | Warranty text: conditions, exclusions, transfer |
| “We’ll get you approved” | Promise outside the clinic’s control | Financing terms; who decides approval |
| “Best clinic in [city]” or issuer-free badge | Misleading representation; unverified endorsement | Issuer, criteria, year, sample |
| “Painless,” “no risk,” or “works for everyone” | Harmful health claims contradicting consensus | Which claims came from your exam and imaging |
| Prescription items or supplement-style add-ons sold online | Restricted: prescription drugs; unapproved supplements | Is a prescription required? What is sold versus prescribed in person? |
| Lead form or retargeted ad | Privacy and interest-based-ad disclosure | Stated data-use disclosure; ad label |
The categories differ. Free and lifetime promises sit nearest impossible-to-fulfil examples; badges sit nearer misleading representation. Health wording sits in the harmful-claims category, though retrieved examples concern vaccination, disease denial, and conversion therapy—not dentistry. Use the table as a question generator.
Turn Price Headlines Into Exclusions
A low headline price is a question, not a verdict. Compliance guidance treats a promise made but left unclear as a normal violation example; explicit impossible-to-fulfil promises, including free or cash offers and unreasonably cheap offers, are classed as egregious. The issue is not the number but whether conditions are stated. Ask what the offer excludes, which exam, imaging, sedation, lab work, or follow-up fees are separate, and whether the price is limited to a narrow case type. Request the total in a written fee schedule. If a phone quote differs, keep the written version and ask what changed. Do not pay a deposit before that document exists.
Trace the Badge Before Trusting the Ranking
“Best in the city” is a ranking claim, but a badge is only as good as its issuer. The policy documents give a revealing example: promising “a list of top doctors near you” while never supplying a real list. That is the shape of an unverifiable ranking—it borrows authority without letting you inspect the source. Three substitutions make it checkable: who issued the badge, what measurable criteria were used, and for which year. A self-published logo answers none. If the clinic cannot name the issuer, treat the ranking as decoration.
Separate Warranty, Outcome Guarantee, Approval
“Guaranteed for life” sounds stronger than a warranty, but the words do different work. A warranty is a set of contractual terms: coverage, duration, maintenance conditions, exclusions, and transferability. An outcome guarantee is a promise about a result. The compliance guidance lists specific promises outside the offeror’s control as egregious examples; financing approval is exactly that kind of third-party decision. Ask for the warranty text and the written financing terms. The first should state conditions and exclusions; the second should name who decides approval and what happens if you are declined. A verbal “we’ll get you approved” is not a term. Neither is a guarantee you cannot read before signing.
Read Health Wording as a Limit
“Painless,” “no risk,” and “works for everyone” cannot be checked before an examination. Individual clinical variability means no honest universal outcome can be promised from a website. The publisher-policy framework treats harmful health claims that contradict authoritative scientific consensus as off-limits for ad-supported content. The retrieved examples concern anti-vaccination content, disease denial, and conversion therapy; no dental example was supplied, so the analogy has limits. The practical test remains: during or after a consultation, ask which statements came from your own exam and imaging, and which were general marketing language. If every sentence remains universal, you have learned about the page’s wording, not your prospects.
Check Add-Ons and the Lead Form
Two narrow checks remain. If a clinic page sells prescription items online or pushes supplement-style “bone support” products, policy documents place these in restricted categories. Ask whether a prescription is required and what is sold online versus prescribed in person. If the page collects contact or health details or retargets you, look for a stated privacy and data-use disclosure. Google’s publisher requirements call for disclosure of data collection, sharing, and use tied to its products, and for interest-based ads to be labeled. That is not a health-privacy guarantee; state rules vary and were not retrieved. A form that asks for medical details without explaining their use asks for undocumented trust.
Five Requests Before You Pay a Deposit
Before paying a deposit, request five items in writing:
- An itemized plan and fee schedule, with exclusions and extras.
- The treating clinician’s name and care location.
- Warranty text: conditions, exclusions, transfer.
- Financing terms and who decides approval.
- The privacy and data-use disclosure for any form or tracking.
Add the badge issuer if ranking is part of the pitch. None of this proves clinical quality. The evidence here is advertising and publisher-policy material, not clinical, licensing, pricing, or outcomes research. State licensing, warranty enforceability, and health-privacy rules vary and were not retrieved. An unverifiable claim warrants a document request; it does not prove poor care. Bring the documents to a licensed clinician.
研究の知恵